People v. Johnson
This text of 259 A.D. 921 (People v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court of Kings County, convicting the defendant of the crimes of sodomy and assault in the third degree, with an indeterminate sentence of not less than ten and not more than twenty years for the crime of sodomy, and a suspension of sentence for the crime of assault in the third degree, reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered. The evidence amply establishes that the defendant was guilty of some grade of crime with respect to the occurrences in which he and the complainant were involved. There was, however, a close question of fact as to whether he was guilty of the serious crime of sodomy. In view of the state of the proof as to this offense, it was prejudicial error for the trial court on several occasions inaccurately to observe that the complainant’s prior contradictory testimony on the magistrate’s hearing was not inconsistent with her testimony on this trial and thus minimize the effect of the contradictory character of the prior evidence. It was likewise prejudicial error for the trial court, in connection with those erroneous observations, to restrict unduly the cross-examination of the complaining witness as to her prior contradictory testimony. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 921, 20 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1940.