People v. Johnson

247 N.W.2d 310, 70 Mich. App. 349, 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 852
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 1976·No. Docket 27172·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully driving away a motor vehicle, MCLA 750.413; MSA 28.645, and receiving stolen property over $100, MCLA 750.535; MSA 28.803. He was sentenced to two concurrent sentences of 2-1/2 to 5 years in prison and appeals as of right.

We cannot consider defendant’s argument that the prosecutor failed to endorse and produce alleged res gestae witnesses. Defendant did not request the production of the witnesses prior to or during trial, nor did he move for a new trial. People v Robinson, 390 Mich 629, 634; 213 NW2d 106 (1973). The issue is not preserved for appellate review.

We find no merit in the argument that the trial court erred in failing to obtain defendant’s personal consent to the waiver of production of endorsed witnesses. The right of confrontation is not of such moment that it requires waiver by the defendant personally when he is represented by counsel. Such waiver as we have in this case is a trial tactic within the province of counsel. People v Lawrence, 32 Mich App 591, 593; 189 NW2d 48 (1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 247 N.W.2d 310, 70 Mich. App. 349, 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 852 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976).

247 N.W.2d 310 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Buie
817 N.W.2d 33 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2012)
People v. Robinson
378 N.W.2d 551 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Lawson
335 N.W.2d 43 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Johnston
256 N.W.2d 782 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1977)