People v. Johnson
This text of 635 N.W.2d 491 (People v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Phillip H. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the January 25, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals and motion to remand are considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the Court of Appeals' order dated January 25, 2001, dismissing defendant's claim of appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because this case arises from a criminal prosecution for a crime committed before December 27, 1994, defendant retains an appeal of right. People v. Kaczmarek, 464 Mich. 478, 628 N.W.2d 484 (2001). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reinstatement of defendant's appeal.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
CORRIGAN, C.J., states as follows:
I concur in the result but continue to adhere to my dissenting opinion in People v. Kaczmarek, 464 Mich. 478, 628 N.W.2d 484 (2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
635 N.W.2d 491, 465 Mich. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-johnson-mich-2001.