People v. Johns (Ronnie)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2016
Docket2016 NYSlipOp 50342(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Johns (Ronnie) (People v. Johns (Ronnie)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Johns (Ronnie), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Ronnie Johns, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), rendered January 17, 2012, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of trademark counterfeiting in the third degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), rendered January 17, 2012, affirmed.

In view of defendant's knowing waiver of his right to prosecution by information, the accusatory instrument only had to satisfy the reasonable cause requirement (see People v Dumay, 23 NY3d 518 [2014]). So viewed, the accusatory instrument - comprising the misdemeanor complaint and supporting depositions of a representative of the trademark owner - was jurisdictionally valid, since it described facts of an evidentiary nature establishing reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the offense of trademark counterfeiting in the third degree (see Penal Law § 165.71). For purposes of our threshold, pleading stage inquiry, the accusatory instrument sufficiently alleged that the digital video discs (DVDs) displayed and offered for sale by defendant, which bore the trademarks of Columbia Pictures, Universal and Dreamworks, were counterfeit, based upon several specifically enumerated features distinguishing them from genuine DVDs, and that the allegedly counterfeit trademarks appearing on the DVDs were registered and in use (see People v Wele, 41 Misc 3d 133[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51804[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1044 [2013], People v Seye, 40 Misc 3d 127[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51046[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1077 [2013]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: March 22, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dumay
16 N.E.3d 1150 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Johns (Ronnie), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-johns-ronnie-nyappterm-2016.