People v. Johns

244 A.D.2d 951, 668 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johns. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D.2d 748

Opinion

—Judgment unani[952]*952mously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh or severe does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763; People v West, 239 AD2d 921). In any event, defendant’s sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, People v Wiggins, 227 AD2d 918, lv denied 89 NY2d 1016). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Fricano, J.—Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johns, 244 A.D.2d 951, 668 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 951 (People v. Johns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Allen
623 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Wiggins
227 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. West
239 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)