People v. John R. Simmons

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 17, 2017·No. 139 SSM 25·Published

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 139 SSM 25 The People &c., Respondent,

v.

John R. Simmons, Appellant.

Submitted by Barbara J. Davies, for appellant. Submitted by Julie Bender Fiske, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination regarding a founded suspicion of criminality, justifying the arresting officer's demand that defendant "show his hands," involves a mixed question of law and fact (see People

- 2 - SSM 25

v Mercado, 25 NY3d 936, 937 [2015]; People v Valerio, 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]). Based on the police officer's experience handling gun cases, the high crime rate and gang violence in the patrol area, the recent reports of gunshots fired near the location where defendant was first observed, and defendant's clutching of his waistband, there is record evidence to support a finding of founded suspicion. The totality of these circumstances provides sufficient indicia of criminality to warrant a level-two inquiry under People v De Bour (40 NY2d 210, 223 [1976]). Therefore, the determinations made below are beyond our further review. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided October 17, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. John R. Simmons, (N.Y. 2017).

People v. John R. Simmons (People v. John R. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Valerio
744 N.E.2d 136 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Mercado
28 N.E.3d 1181 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. De Bour
352 N.E.2d 562 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)