People v. John F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. John F.

77 A.D.2d 885, 431 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 4, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 885 (People v. John F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. John F., 77 A.D.2d 885, 431 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed January 16, 1980, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, the sentence being probation for a period of five years, one condition of which was the service of 60 days’ intermittent imprisonment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting therefrom the condition that defendant serve 60 days’ intermittent imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith and pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Lazer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed January 16, 1980, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, the sentence being probation for a period of five years, one condition of which was the service of 60 days’ intermittent imprisonment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting therefrom the condition that defendant serve 60 days’ intermittent imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith and pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Lazer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 885, 431 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-john-f-nyappdiv-1980.