People v. John B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. John B.

14 A.D.3d 575, 787 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 419

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 14 A.D.3d 575 (People v. John B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. John B., 14 A.D.3d 575, 787 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J), both rendered August 17, 2000, (1) convicting him of sodomy in the first degree under indictment No. 924/99, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to robbery in the second degree, under indictment No. 1600/00, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant effectively waived appellate review of the issues he raises as a part of his negotiated plea agreements (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Boykin, 1 AD3d 524 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J), both rendered August 17, 2000, (1) convicting him of sodomy in the first degree under indictment No. 924/99, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to robbery in the second degree, under indictment No. 1600/00, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant effectively waived appellate review of the issues he raises as a part of his negotiated plea agreements (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Boykin, 1 AD3d 524 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 A.D.3d 575, 787 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-john-b-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack