People v. Jock
This text of 68 A.D.3d 1816 (People v. Jock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), the sole contention of defendant is that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request for youthful offender status. We reject that contention (see People v Smith, 286 AD2d 878 [2001], lv denied 98 NY2d 641 [2002]). It is well established that the decision whether to grant youthful offender status “rests within the sound discretion of the court and depends upon all the attending facts and circumstances of the case” (People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930 [1990]). We decline to grant the further request of defendant that we exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate him a youthful offender (cf. id. at 930-931). Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 1816, 890 N.Y.2d 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jock-nyappdiv-2009.