People v. Jinsong He

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jinsong He

291 A.D.2d 413, 736 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1329

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 413 (People v. Jinsong He) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jinsong He, 291 A.D.2d 413, 736 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered February 23, 1999, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to impeach the defense witnesses with illegally-recorded tapes of their conversations is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 255.20 [1]; 710.40 [1]; 710.60; People v Cherlea, 265 AD2d 338). In any event, the trial court properly ruled that the tapes could be used to impeach the credibility of the defense witnesses (see, People v McGrath, 46 NY2d 12, cert denied 440 US 972; People v Hughes, 124 AD2d 344; People v Brooks, 56 AD2d 634).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered February 23, 1999, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to impeach the defense witnesses with illegally-recorded tapes of their conversations is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 255.20 [1]; 710.40 [1]; 710.60; People v Cherlea, 265 AD2d 338). In any event, the trial court properly ruled that the tapes could be used to impeach the credibility of the defense witnesses (see, People v McGrath, 46 NY2d 12, cert denied 440 US 972; People v Hughes, 124 AD2d 344; People v Brooks, 56 AD2d 634).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 413, 736 N.Y.S.2d 903, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jinsong-he-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack