People v. Jinks
140 A.D.2d 371, 527 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4690
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1988·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
It appears that the defendant is not currently incarcerated or under parole supervision. All efforts by assigned appellate counsel to locate the defendant have been unsuccessful. Furthermore, the defendant, who was provided with the name and address of his assigned attorney, has not contacted the attorney in nearly three years. The defendant has thus demon[372] strated a lack of interest in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Jinks, 140 A.D.2d 371, 527 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 371 (People v. Jinks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bell
184 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Estrada
173 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Cullum
170 A.D.2d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Luczer
163 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Velez
156 A.D.2d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Gelley
155 A.D.2d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Wright
143 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)