People v. Jiminez

127 A.D.2d 481, 511 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42975
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jiminez. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.2d 629

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Fitzgerald, J.), rendered April 18, 1985, convicting defendant after a jury trial of [482]*482robbery in the first and second degrees and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 7 to 14 years and 4 to 8 years, is unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts apd as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to provide that the sentence of 7 to 14 years on the conviction for robbery in the first degree be reduced to áVi to 9 years, both sentences to run concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

Under the circumstances present herein, the sentence imposed upon defendant of 7 to 14 years was excessive and we modify accordingly. We have examined the remaining contentions of defendant and find them to be without merit. Concur —Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jiminez, 127 A.D.2d 481, 511 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

127 A.D.2d 481 (People v. Jiminez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.