People v. Jiminez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jiminez

127 A.D.2d 481, 511 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42975

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 481 (People v. Jiminez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jiminez, 127 A.D.2d 481, 511 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Fitzgerald, J.), rendered April 18, 1985, convicting defendant after a jury trial of [482]*482robbery in the first and second degrees and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 7 to 14 years and 4 to 8 years, is unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts apd as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to provide that the sentence of 7 to 14 years on the conviction for robbery in the first degree be reduced to áVi to 9 years, both sentences to run concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

Under the circumstances present herein, the sentence imposed upon defendant of 7 to 14 years was excessive and we modify accordingly. We have examined the remaining contentions of defendant and find them to be without merit. Concur —Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Fitzgerald, J.), rendered April 18, 1985, convicting defendant after a jury trial of [482]*482robbery in the first and second degrees and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 7 to 14 years and 4 to 8 years, is unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts apd as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to provide that the sentence of 7 to 14 years on the conviction for robbery in the first degree be reduced to áVi to 9 years, both sentences to run concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

Under the circumstances present herein, the sentence imposed upon defendant of 7 to 14 years was excessive and we modify accordingly. We have examined the remaining contentions of defendant and find them to be without merit. Concur —Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 481, 511 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jiminez-nyappdiv-1987.