People v. Jimenez
This text of 433 N.E.2d 1270 (People v. Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reversing defendant’s conviction for assault in the second degree, dismissing that part of the indictment, and vacating the sentence imposed on that count. As so modified, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The People failed to prove that the victim of the alleged assault suffered physical injury within the meaning of subdivision 6 of section 120.05 and subdivision 9 of section 10.00 of the Penal Law. Testimony that the victim suffered a one centimeter cut above her lip, without more, was not adequate to prove that the victim suffered either “substantial pain” (Matter of Philip A., 49 NY2d 198) or “impairment of a physical condition” (People v McDowell, 28 NY2d 373, 375).
Defendant’s other contentions are either not preserved for review or do not warrant reversal by this court.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Jones taking no part.
Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 N.E.2d 1270, 55 N.Y.2d 895, 449 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jimenez-ny-1982.