People v. Jie Mei Chen
This text of 26 A.D.3d 344 (People v. Jie Mei Chen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated March 20, 2004, as, after a hearing, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated March 21, 2001, denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court (Finnegan, J.), rendered August 19, 1997.
[345]*345Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and upon reargument, the order dated March 21, 2001, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing consistent herewith, before a different justice, and a new determination.
Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court should have appointed counsel to represent the defendant at the hearing on his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment rendered August 19, 1997. Crane, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 344, 810 N.Y.S.2d 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jie-mei-chen-nyappdiv-2006.