People v. Jeter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jeter

129 A.D.2d 738, 514 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 738 (People v. Jeter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jeter, 129 A.D.2d 738, 514 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), both rendered July 29, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 1935/84 (two counts), and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 218/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues [739]*739which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), both rendered July 29, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 1935/84 (two counts), and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 218/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues [739]*739which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 738, 514 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jeter-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack