People v. Jersey

18 Cal. 337, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 191
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1861·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

Judgment reversed. The indictment is only good as an indictment for ordinary larceny, but not good as an indictment.for the statutory offense of converting property of which the defendant was bailee. The offense of larceny, apart from the crime constituted by statute from the conversion of a bailed article, is not complete, unless the original taking be felonious. In other words, in this case, the prisoner, at the time of hiring the horse, must have intended tó steal it, the felonious intent at the time of the taking being of the essence of the crime. The Court erred in refusing to instruct the jury in accordance with this view.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jersey, 18 Cal. 337, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 191 (Cal. 1861).

18 Cal. 337 (People v. Jersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Arroyo
29 P.R. 584 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1921)
Pueblo v. Arroyo
29 P.R. Dec. 628 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1921)
People v. Morino
24 P. 892 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
People v. Dumar
5 N.Y. Crim. 55 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
People v. Smith
23 Cal. 280 (California Supreme Court, 1863)