People v. Jersey

18 Cal. 337, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 191
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 18 Cal. 337 (People v. Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jersey, 18 Cal. 337, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 191 (Cal. 1861).

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

Judgment reversed. The indictment is only good as an indictment for ordinary larceny, but not good as an indictment.for the statutory offense of converting property of which the defendant was bailee. The offense of larceny, apart from the crime constituted by statute from the conversion of a bailed article, is not complete, unless the original taking be felonious. In other words, in this case, the prisoner, at the time of hiring the horse, must have intended tó steal it, the felonious intent at the time of the taking being of the essence of the crime. The Court erred in refusing to instruct the jury in accordance with this view.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Arroyo
29 P.R. 584 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1921)
Pueblo v. Arroyo
29 P.R. Dec. 628 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1921)
People v. Morino
24 P. 892 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
People v. Dumar
5 N.Y. Crim. 55 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
People v. Smith
23 Cal. 280 (California Supreme Court, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Cal. 337, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jersey-cal-1861.