People v. Jerome
49 A.D.3d 556, 851 N.Y.2d 885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[557]*557The trial court’s determination that the explanations provided by the People for exercising peremptory challenges to four black male venirepersons were not pretextual is supported by the record and will not be disturbed on appeal (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]; Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 359 [1991]; People v Caraballo, 238 AD2d 517 [1997]). Thus, the defendant’s Batson challenge was properly denied. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Jerome, 49 A.D.3d 556, 851 N.Y.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 556 (People v. Jerome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hurdle
106 A.D.3d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)