People v. Jerome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jerome

49 A.D.3d 556, 851 N.Y.2d 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 556 (People v. Jerome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jerome, 49 A.D.3d 556, 851 N.Y.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

[557]*557The trial court’s determination that the explanations provided by the People for exercising peremptory challenges to four black male venirepersons were not pretextual is supported by the record and will not be disturbed on appeal (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]; Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 359 [1991]; People v Caraballo, 238 AD2d 517 [1997]). Thus, the defendant’s Batson challenge was properly denied. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[557]*557The trial court’s determination that the explanations provided by the People for exercising peremptory challenges to four black male venirepersons were not pretextual is supported by the record and will not be disturbed on appeal (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]; Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 359 [1991]; People v Caraballo, 238 AD2d 517 [1997]). Thus, the defendant’s Batson challenge was properly denied. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.3d 556, 851 N.Y.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jerome-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack