People v. Jennings

210 A.D.2d 349, 620 N.Y.S.2d 282
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jennings. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 A.D.2d 885

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), rendered July 10, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Further, the defendant’s claim that the court displayed a bias against and a hostility toward him and his proposed witness is not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see, People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44; People v Jamison, 47 NY2d 882; People v Moulton, 43 NY2d 944; People v Buckheit, 95 AD2d 814).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jennings, 210 A.D.2d 349, 620 N.Y.S.2d 282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 349 (People v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moulton
374 N.E.2d 1243 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Jamison
393 N.E.2d 467 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Yut Wai Tom
422 N.E.2d 556 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Buckheit
95 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)