People v. Jenner

213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jenner. Read the opinion of the Court — 202 A.D.2d 986

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Onondaga County Court for a reconstruction hearing (People v Jenner, 202 AD2d 986) in accordance with our decision in People v Mitchell (189 AD2d 337). The record of the reconstruction hearing supports the findings of the court that no Sandoval discussion occurred outside defendant’s presence and that defendant was able to participate meaningfully in the Sandoval hearing held in open court.

We further conclude that defendant’s conviction is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jenner, 213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 1076 (People v. Jenner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Mitchell
189 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Jenner
202 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)