People v. Jenner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jenner

213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 1076 (People v. Jenner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jenner, 213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Onondaga County Court for a reconstruction hearing (People v Jenner, 202 AD2d 986) in accordance with our decision in People v Mitchell (189 AD2d 337). The record of the reconstruction hearing supports the findings of the court that no Sandoval discussion occurred outside defendant’s presence and that defendant was able to participate meaningfully in the Sandoval hearing held in open court.

We further conclude that defendant’s conviction is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Onondaga County Court for a reconstruction hearing (People v Jenner, 202 AD2d 986) in accordance with our decision in People v Mitchell (189 AD2d 337). The record of the reconstruction hearing supports the findings of the court that no Sandoval discussion occurred outside defendant’s presence and that defendant was able to participate meaningfully in the Sandoval hearing held in open court.

We further conclude that defendant’s conviction is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jenner-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack