People v. Jenkins
This text of 64 Misc. 2d 826 (People v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s guilt of the crimes of assault in the third degree and resisting arrest was established beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant also contends that the sentence of a fine of $50 on each of these two counts was excessive. She failed to substantiate that contention to our satisfaction (see Code Grim. Pro., §§ 470-d, 470L-e).
The mere fact that defendant is a recipient of supplemental. welfare benefits does not, ipso facto, exempt her from the sanctions of the criminal law. In this respect her position is no [827]*827different from any other defendant^ who contends that his financial condition is such that he is unable to pay a fine.
The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.
Concur — G-old, J. P., Markowitz and Quinn, JJ.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 Misc. 2d 826, 316 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jenkins-nyappterm-1970.