People v. Jenkins

96 A.D.3d 445, 945 N.Y.S.2d 555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jenkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 A.D.3d 993

Opinion

— Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered June 2, 2010, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to two consecutive terms of 25 years, with an aggregate period of five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision (PRS) was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Defendant’s argument regarding the calculation of his PRS term does not require any action by this court. Defendant’s pro se claims are both procedurally defective and without merit. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jenkins, 96 A.D.3d 445, 945 N.Y.S.2d 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 445 (People v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)