People v. Jenkins

208 A.D.2d 864, 618 N.Y.S.2d 56
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jenkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 A.D.2d 642

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J), rendered December 19, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s right to be present during the impaneling of the jury was not violated by his absence from a conference in-chambers during which counsel advised the court of their peremptory challenges and challenges for cause (see, People v Velasco, 77 NY2d 469). The record reveals that the defendant was present during the voir dire and the removal of the jurors from. the panel was conducted in open court (see, People v Velasco, supra; People v Melendez, 182 AD2d 644).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jenkins, 208 A.D.2d 864, 618 N.Y.S.2d 56 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 864 (People v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Velasco
570 N.E.2d 1070 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Melendez
182 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)