People v. Jenkins

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Jenkins

175 N.W.2d 49, 21 Mich. App. 245, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2087

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7,481

StatusPublished

This text of 175 N.W.2d 49 (People v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jenkins, 175 N.W.2d 49, 21 Mich. App. 245, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2087 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by jury verdict of assault with intent to commit rape. MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280). On appeal, defendant contends that the prosecution failed to identify defendant as the perpetrator of the alleged offense. A review of the record reveals that the testimony of the complaining witness, if believed, was sufficient to identify defendant as her assailant. Her testimony occurred in a context in which it was clear that the witness was referring to defendant.

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by jury verdict of assault with intent to commit rape. MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280). On appeal, defendant contends that the prosecution failed to identify defendant as the perpetrator of the alleged offense. A review of the record reveals that the testimony of the complaining witness, if believed, was sufficient to identify defendant as her assailant. Her testimony occurred in a context in which it was clear that the witness was referring to defendant.

Affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 N.W.2d 49, 21 Mich. App. 245, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jenkins-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack