People v. Jenco

67 A.D.2d 950, 413 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10730

This text of 67 A.D.2d 950 (People v. Jenco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jenco, 67 A.D.2d 950, 413 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 8, 1978, convicting him of forgery, [951]*951criminal possession of stolen property, criminal possession of a forged instrument, and attempted grand larceny, all in the second degree, and criminal impersonation, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to indeterminate prison terms of from three to six years each on the forgery and possession of a forged instrument counts, two to four years each on the possession of stolen property and attempted grand larceny counts, and one year on the criminal impersonation count, with all sentences to run concurrently. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentences imposed on the convictions for forgery and possession of a forged instrument to two to four years each, with said sentences to be concurrent with the other sentences. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In our view, the sentences were excessive to the extent indicated. In addition, it is our view that two of the prosecutor’s questions during his cross-examination of the defendant were improper (see People v Mariable; 58 AD2d 877). However, in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt presented in this case, we hold that these errors were harmless (see People v Mariable, supra; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). We have examined defendant’s remaining points and find them to be without merit. Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A.D.2d 950, 413 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jenco-nyappdiv-1979.