People v. Jefferson
This text of 158 A.D.2d 281 (People v. Jefferson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony of the victim and the two eyewitnesses to the attempted robbery was consistent in describing defendant’s forcible attempt to wrest the money from her hand. Even though the elderly victim did not recall all of the details, her testimony did not contradict that of the eyewitnesses who saw defendant grab her and force her to one knee before literally having to pry him away from her. There was ample evidence for the jury appropriately to find that defendant used force in attempting to steal his victim’s money.
Released after arraignment on his own recognizance, defendant missed two court dates, and was returned to court after his arrest on a bench warrant nearly two months after his [282]*282second scheduled court appearance date. The record reveals no mitigating circumstances to avoid the imposition of consecutive sentences mandated by Penal Law § 70.25 (2-c). Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 281, 550 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jefferson-nyappdiv-1990.