People v. Jean

2020 NY Slip Op 431, 179 A.D.3d 947, 114 N.Y.S.3d 239
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2020
DocketInd. No. 3134/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 431 (People v. Jean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jean, 2020 NY Slip Op 431, 179 A.D.3d 947, 114 N.Y.S.3d 239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Jean (2020 NY Slip Op 00431)
People v Jean
2020 NY Slip Op 00431
Decided on January 22, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 22, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-10043
(Ind. No. 3134/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Paolo Jean, appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Sarah G. Pitts of counsel; Isaiah Affron on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Suzanne M. Mondo, J.), rendered July 29, 2016, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256).

DILLON, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 431, 179 A.D.3d 947, 114 N.Y.S.3d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jean-nyappdiv-2020.