People v. Javier

2019 NY Slip Op 696
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2019
Docket8299 1348/06
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 696 (People v. Javier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Javier, 2019 NY Slip Op 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Javier (2019 NY Slip Op 00696)
People v Javier
2019 NY Slip Op 00696
Decided on January 31, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

8299 1348/06

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Albert Javier, Defendant-Appellant.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Svetlana M. Kornfeind of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Christopher P. Marinelli of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered August 10, 2015, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 30 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for resentencing.

We previously directed a further resentencing (128 AD3d 494 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 968 [2015]) on the ground that defendant's 2011 Drug Law Reform Act resentencing was improper with regard to concurrent and consecutive sentences (see People v Norris, 20 NY3d 1068 [2013]). On remand, the court imposed a resentence that is still defective under Norris as to counts 24 and 25 of the indictment. Accordingly, another resentencing on

those counts is required. However, the record refutes defendant's remaining contention that, at the 2011 resentencing, the court failed to impose any sentence on count 24.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 31, 2019

DEPUTY CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Norris
986 N.E.2d 901 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-javier-nyappdiv-2019.