People v. Jarrells

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jarrells

31 A.D.2d 944, 298 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4454

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 944 (People v. Jarrells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jarrells, 31 A.D.2d 944, 298 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 19, 1967, affirmed. Defendant’s application was referred to by the court below as a motion for resentenee. An order denying such a motion would not be appealable. We have, however, considered defendant’s application as one in the nature of coram nobis and are of the opinion that it is without merit. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 19, 1967, affirmed. Defendant’s application was referred to by the court below as a motion for resentenee. An order denying such a motion would not be appealable. We have, however, considered defendant’s application as one in the nature of coram nobis and are of the opinion that it is without merit. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 944, 298 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jarrells-nyappdiv-1969.