People v. Jara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jara

196 A.D.2d 848, 603 N.Y.S.2d 758

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 848 (People v. Jara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jara, 196 A.D.2d 848, 603 N.Y.S.2d 758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), rendered August 12, 1991.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered.

The defendant having raised no other issues, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), rendered August 12, 1991.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered.

The defendant having raised no other issues, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 848, 603 N.Y.S.2d 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jara-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack