People v. Jamison
This text of 276 A.D.2d 565 (People v. Jamison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), rendered March 10, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the presentence report of the codefendant, which contained a statement made by the complainant, did not constitute Brady material which should have been disclosed by the People (see, Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83; People v Cwikla, 46 NY2d 434, 441).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 A.D.2d 565, 714 N.Y.S.2d 242, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jamison-nyappdiv-2000.