People v. Jamison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jamison

187 A.D.2d 454, 590 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 454 (People v. Jamison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jamison, 187 A.D.2d 454, 590 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered December 17, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered December 17, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 454, 590 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jamison-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack