People v. Jameson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jameson

2017 NY Slip Op 2815, 149 A.D.3d 869, 49 N.Y.S.3d 919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 2017

Docket2016-02816

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2815 (People v. Jameson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jameson, 2017 NY Slip Op 2815, 149 A.D.3d 869, 49 N.Y.S.3d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered February 10, 2016, convicting her of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to *870 withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Hernandez, 133 AD3d 881 [2015]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), rendered February 10, 2016, convicting her of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to *870 withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Hernandez, 133 AD3d 881 [2015]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 2815, 149 A.D.3d 869, 49 N.Y.S.3d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jameson-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack