People v. James

2025 NY Slip Op 02608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 N.Y.S.3d 858
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2025·No. Ind. No. 70649/21·Published

Opinion

People v James (2025 NY Slip Op 02608)
People v James
2025 NY Slip Op 02608
Decided on April 30, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 30, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
WILLIAM G. FORD
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2022-09825
(Ind. No. 70649/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Julian James, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky and James Joseph Gandia of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mario F. Mattei, J.), rendered October 26, 2022, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing should be vacated because the Supreme Court failed to state on the record its reason for issuing the order of protection (see CPL 530.13[4]) is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant failed to object to the order of protection at sentencing or otherwise raise the issue before the court (see id. § 470.05[2]; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318; People v Newman, 234 AD3d 877, 878; People v Villan, 234 AD3d 717, 718). Under the circumstances, we decline to reach this contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Villan, 234 AD3d at 718; People v Colon, 204 AD3d 938, 939). "[T]he better practice—and best use of judicial resources—is for a defendant seeking adjustment of [final orders of protection] to request relief from the issuing court in the first instance, resorting to the appellate courts only if necessary" (People v Nieves, 2 NY3d at 317; see People v Person, 233 AD3d 804, 804).

CHAMBERS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, FORD and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 2025 NY Slip Op 02608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 02608 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nieves
811 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Colon
164 N.Y.S.3d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)