People v. James
245 A.D.2d 1115, 666 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13931
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The record does not establish whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing. We therefore remit this matter for a reconstruction hearing (see, e.g., People v Johnson, 206 AD2d 874, 875). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. James, 245 A.D.2d 1115, 666 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).
245 A.D.2d 1115 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Goodman
275 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. James
252 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)