People v. James

201 A.D.2d 272, 608 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 679

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered February 14, 1992, convicting defendants, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing defendant Page to a term of 4 to 12 years, and sentencing defendant James, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ motions to suppress identification testimony were properly denied, each defendant having been identified at a prompt, at-the-scene showup (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 545), and the defendants having been apprehended in a stolen taxi.

The challenged portions of the People’s summation did not exceed the bounds of proper advocacy (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399), and would, in any event, be considered harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt.

Contrary to Page’s contention, his sentence was not excessive, especially in view of his reprehensible conduct during the crime. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 201 A.D.2d 272, 608 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 272 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Duuvon
571 N.E.2d 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)