People v. James

192 A.D.2d 496, 597 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4399
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered September 27, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

[497]*497The show-up identification, obtained 20 minutes after the incident and within 5 or 6 blocks of the subway site of the crime, was not unduly suggestive (People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023; People v Muhammad, 159 AD2d 266, lv denied 76 NY2d 740). Show-up identifications, proximate in time and place to the crime, are deemed trustworthy because the memory of the identifying witness is fresh (People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184, 194, cert denied 396 US 1020). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 192 A.D.2d 496, 597 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 496 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Butler
290 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Feliz
251 A.D.2d 134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)