People v. James

121 A.D.2d 656, 504 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 A.D.2d 254

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.), rendered May 12, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The jury properly found that the defendant used or threatened to use a dangerous instrument in the course of the robbery (see, Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). "It is the temporary use rather than the inherent vice of the object which brings it within the purview of the statute” (People v Carter, 53 NY2d [657]*657113, 116). The picking up and swinging of a shopping cart at the victims was an act capable of causing serious physical injury, and accordingly, the use of a dangerous instrument was properly found. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 121 A.D.2d 656, 504 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

121 A.D.2d 656 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Carter
423 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)