People v. James Holloway

498 Mich. 947
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 24, 2015
Docket150038
StatusPublished

This text of 498 Mich. 947 (People v. James Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. James Holloway, 498 Mich. 947 (Mich. 2015).

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we remand this case to the Macomb Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On'remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resen-tence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.

VIVIANO, J., did not participate due to a familial relationship with the presiding circuit court judge in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lockridge
870 N.W.2d 502 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 Mich. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-james-holloway-mich-2015.