People v. James H. Northrop, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. James H. Northrop, Inc.

85 Misc. 2d 298, 378 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3295

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 85 Misc. 2d 298 (People v. James H. Northrop, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. James H. Northrop, Inc., 85 Misc. 2d 298, 378 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. Judgments convicting defendant of violating article XV, section 27-92, subdivision (a) of the Islip Town Code (failure to obtain a permit for rental of a one-family dwelling) and one charge of violating article III, section 32-19 of the Islip Town Code (owner to maintain private premises free of litter) affirmed. Judgment convicting defendant of a second charge of violating article III, section 32-19 of the Islip Town Code reversed on the law.

It was improper to convict defendant on two charges identical as to time, place and offense alleged. As to the remaining littering conviction, not only do we find proper authorization for the enactment of this section (Town Law, § 130, subd 3-a; Public Health Law, § 228, subd 2), but also find the statute constitutional and consistent with the relevant State statutes (see 10 NYCRR 21.4 [c], 21.10-21.13). As to defendant’s conviction, we find no merit to the allegation that the section is unconstitutional.

[299]*299Concur: Hogan, P.J., Glickman and Farley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. Judgments convicting defendant of violating article XV, section 27-92, subdivision (a) of the Islip Town Code (failure to obtain a permit for rental of a one-family dwelling) and one charge of violating article III, section 32-19 of the Islip Town Code (owner to maintain private premises free of litter) affirmed. Judgment convicting defendant of a second charge of violating article III, section 32-19 of the Islip Town Code reversed on the law.

It was improper to convict defendant on two charges identical as to time, place and offense alleged. As to the remaining littering conviction, not only do we find proper authorization for the enactment of this section (Town Law, § 130, subd 3-a; Public Health Law, § 228, subd 2), but also find the statute constitutional and consistent with the relevant State statutes (see 10 NYCRR 21.4 [c], 21.10-21.13). As to defendant’s conviction, we find no merit to the allegation that the section is unconstitutional.

[299]*299Concur: Hogan, P.J., Glickman and Farley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 Misc. 2d 298, 378 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-james-h-northrop-inc-nyappterm-1975.