People v. James D.
This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 07521 (People v. James D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v James D. |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 07521 |
| Decided on December 28, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: December 28, 2021
Before: Kern, J.P., Moulton, Mendez, Shulman, Higgitt, JJ.
Ind No. 1473/15 Appeal No. 14913 Case No. 2020-03760
v
James D., Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shaina R. Watrous of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Diana J. Lewis of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J.), entered on or about July 13, 2020, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]), and we find no basis to substitute our own discretion in this regard. The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime and the nature and number of his other sex offense convictions (see e.g. People v Colon, 149 AD3d 498 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 916 [2017]). In the underlying incident, defendant assaulted and attempted to rape a female stranger after following her into her apartment building. His other convictions involved forcible touching of female strangers, with one occurring six days after his guilty plea in this case. Further, the progress defendant had demonstrated occurred solely while he was in a controlled environment and is not necessarily indicative of his future conduct while at liberty. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: December 28, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 NY Slip Op 07521, 155 N.Y.S.3d 766, 200 A.D.3d 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-james-d-nyappdiv-2021.