People v. Jambor
This text of 720 N.W.2d 746 (People v. Jambor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dwight-Sterling David JAMBOR, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The exhibits were sufficiently authenticated as fingerprint cards relating to the offense, containing complaint number, address, signature of the preparing officer, and were referenced and described in a report prepared by the officer as confirmed by a witness whose credibility was not questioned, thereby satisfying MRE 901. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining issues raised by the parties in the appeal and cross-appeal filed in the Court of Appeals.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
WEAVER, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 N.W.2d 746, 477 Mich. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jambor-mich-2006.