People v. Jaen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jaen

140 A.D.3d 594, 33 N.Y.S.3d 699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 2016

Docket1568 5704/08

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 594 (People v. Jaen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jaen, 140 A.D.3d 594, 33 N.Y.S.3d 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered September 1, 2010, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her to a term of five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

*595 The court properly denied defendant’s motion to controvert the search warrant that led to the recovery of drugs from defendant’s apartment. Probable cause was established by information provided by a reliable confidential informant regarding two controlled buys personally made by the informant, and sufficiently verified by the police who supervised the buys (see e.g. People v Freeman, 106 AD3d 590 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1073 [2013]; People v Gramson, 50 AD3d 294, 295 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 832 [2008]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered September 1, 2010, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her to a term of five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

*595 The court properly denied defendant’s motion to controvert the search warrant that led to the recovery of drugs from defendant’s apartment. Probable cause was established by information provided by a reliable confidential informant regarding two controlled buys personally made by the informant, and sufficiently verified by the police who supervised the buys (see e.g. People v Freeman, 106 AD3d 590 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1073 [2013]; People v Gramson, 50 AD3d 294, 295 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 832 [2008]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D.3d 594, 33 N.Y.S.3d 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jaen-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack