People v. Jacobs

113 A.D.3d 634, 977 N.Y.2d 910
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jacobs. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.3d 850

Opinion

The defendant validly waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]). Accordingly, the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the suppression ruling, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not affect the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Soria, 99 AD3d 1027, 1028 [2012]), and the alleged excessiveness of the sentence (see [635]*635People v Bissoon, 100 AD3d 917 [2012]). The record reveals that the defendant received an advantageous plea, and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel (see People Ropiza, 100 AD3d 935 [2012]). Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jacobs, 113 A.D.3d 634, 977 N.Y.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

113 A.D.3d 634 (People v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Soria
99 A.D.3d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)