People v. Jacobs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jacobs

17 A.D.3d 383, 791 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3467

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.3d 383 (People v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jacobs, 17 A.D.3d 383, 791 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered March 8, 2001, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly failed to vacate his plea of guilty and dismiss the charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree for failing to complete Samaritan Village’s Residential Treatment Program is unpreserved for appellate review. We note that the defendant failed to request this relief at either his October 6, 2000, court appearance, or his March 8, 2001, sentencing.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered March 8, 2001, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly failed to vacate his plea of guilty and dismiss the charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree for failing to complete Samaritan Village’s Residential Treatment Program is unpreserved for appellate review. We note that the defendant failed to request this relief at either his October 6, 2000, court appearance, or his March 8, 2001, sentencing.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.3d 383, 791 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jacobs-nyappdiv-2005.