People v. Jacobs

36 Cal. App. 93
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 31, 1918
DocketCrim. No. 411
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cal. App. 93 (People v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jacobs, 36 Cal. App. 93 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

BURNETT, J.

The whole record in this case has been examined with care and it appears that no error whatever was committed. The offense of the infamous crime against nature was charged in the information with legal sufficiency; the trial was fairly conducted in every way; the instructions to the jury were complete and accurate, and the testimony as to guilt was overwhelming and conclusive, there being two unimpeached witnesses to the overt act and no adverse showing being made by the defendant.

The judgment and the order are therefore affirmed.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on April 1, 1918.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cal. App. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jacobs-calctapp-1918.