People v. Jacobs

29 Cal. 579
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1866·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sawyer, J.

. The indictment was designed to be for “ an assault with a deadly weapon, etc, with intent to inflict, etc., bodily injury,” etc., under the fiftieth section of the Act concerning crimes and punishments. The indictment charges the defendant with “ an assault with intent to inflict upon the person of another bodily injury;” that said Baron Jacobs, etc., “witha certain pistol, etc., did then and there unlawfully make an assault,” etc. A demurrer to the indictment for insufficiency was sustained and the People appealed. The indictment neither follows the language of the statute, nor charges an assault with “ a deadly weapon,” nor alleges the weapon to. be deadly, nor that the pistol was charged. A pistol may be of such dimensions as to be a deadly weapon without being charged, and it may be so small as to be, without being charged, a very insignificant instrument of assault. There being no averment that the [580] pistol was “a deadly weapon,” and no fact averred by which the Court could see that it was necessarily such, and the language of the statute not being pursued, we think the indictment insufficient, and that the demurrer was properly sustained!

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jacobs, 29 Cal. 579 (Cal. 1866).

29 Cal. 579 (People v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pueblo v. Lange
24 P.R. Dec. 226 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1916)
State v. Godfrey
20 P. 625 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)
People v. Pape
5 P. 621 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
People v. Villarino
5 P. 154 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
State v. Collyer
17 Nev. 275 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1883)
Herman v. Haffenegger
54 Cal. 161 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
People v. Vierra
52 Cal. 451 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
People v. Congleton
44 Cal. 92 (California Supreme Court, 1872)