People v. Jacob M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jacob M.

58 A.D.2d 611, 395 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12666

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 611 (People v. Jacob M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jacob M., 58 A.D.2d 611, 395 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 9, 1976, which, after a hearing at which the court found him guilty of violating probation, (1) revoked the sentence of probation previously imposed upon an adjudication that he was a youthful offender, upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree, and (2) resentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Amended judgment reversed, on the facts, and defendant is restored to probation. The Probation Department is directed to forthwith commence proceedings to place appellant in an appropriate psychiatric care program. Under the circumstances, appellant’s failure to report for one meeting with his probation officer and his leaving the hospital were justified. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 9, 1976, which, after a hearing at which the court found him guilty of violating probation, (1) revoked the sentence of probation previously imposed upon an adjudication that he was a youthful offender, upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree, and (2) resentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Amended judgment reversed, on the facts, and defendant is restored to probation. The Probation Department is directed to forthwith commence proceedings to place appellant in an appropriate psychiatric care program. Under the circumstances, appellant’s failure to report for one meeting with his probation officer and his leaving the hospital were justified. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 611, 395 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jacob-m-nyappdiv-1977.