People v. Jackson
2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253
Opinion
The court were of the same opinion.
The jury requested to be informed by a witness relative to the first or Christian name of Mr. Martine. Mr. Price contended, toties viribus, that the admission of testimony for that purpose.in this stage of the case, after the cause .had been summed up, was not legal.
The objection was overruled by the court, and the question asked.
The prisoners were found guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Jackson, 2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).
2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253 (People v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.