People v. Jackson

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

People v. Jackson

2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253

CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace

DecidedDecember 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jackson, 2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

The court were of the same opinion.

The jury requested to be informed by a witness relative to the first or Christian name of Mr. Martine. Mr. Price contended, toties viribus, that the admission of testimony for that purpose.in this stage of the case, after the cause .had been summed up, was not legal.

The objection was overruled by the court, and the question asked.

The prisoners were found guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court were of the same opinion.

The jury requested to be informed by a witness relative to the first or Christian name of Mr. Martine. Mr. Price contended, toties viribus, that the admission of testimony for that purpose.in this stage of the case, after the cause .had been summed up, was not legal.

The objection was overruled by the court, and the question asked.

The prisoners were found guilty.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-nygensess-1823.