People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jackson

55 A.D.2d 961, 391 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 961 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jackson, 55 A.D.2d 961, 391 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 20, 1975, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. The testimony adduced at the trial fell "far short of establishing that [appellant] aided, abetted or otherwise participated in the [theft]” (see People v Ligouri, 284 NY 309; cf. Penal Law, § 20.00). Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence established nothing more than that appellant drove the codefendants to a location which was near the place where the theft was accomplished, and that he drove away from that location with the codefendants. Such evidence, being wholly circumstantial, does not "exclude to a moral certainty every other hypothesis except that of the accused’s guilt” (see Richardson, Evidence [Prince, 10th ed], § 148, and cases cited therein). In light of the foregoing, the People’s evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a verdict of guilty of robbery in the third degree. We have considered the other arguments raised by appellant and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 20, 1975, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. The testimony adduced at the trial fell "far short of establishing that [appellant] aided, abetted or otherwise participated in the [theft]” (see People v Ligouri, 284 NY 309; cf. Penal Law, § 20.00). Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence established nothing more than that appellant drove the codefendants to a location which was near the place where the theft was accomplished, and that he drove away from that location with the codefendants. Such evidence, being wholly circumstantial, does not "exclude to a moral certainty every other hypothesis except that of the accused’s guilt” (see Richardson, Evidence [Prince, 10th ed], § 148, and cases cited therein). In light of the foregoing, the People’s evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a verdict of guilty of robbery in the third degree. We have considered the other arguments raised by appellant and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 961, 391 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack