People v. Jackson

54 A.D.2d 1132, 389 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15125
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Decision reserved, case held and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum: At the time defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of manslaughter in the first degree, defendant admitted that he had "shot somebody” but asserted that his actions were in self-defense. This assertion should have triggered a further inquiry by the trial court as to the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime and the availability of any defenses. (People v Serrano, 15 NY2d 304.) Such an inquiry was necessary to determine whether defendant’s plea was voluntarily and knowingly made (see People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court—manslaughter, first degree.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Goldman JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jackson, 54 A.D.2d 1132, 389 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 1132 (People v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mackey
160 A.D.2d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Thomas
74 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Nenni
70 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)